ScreenIT
The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
High prevalence of long-term psychophysical olfactory dysfunction in patients with COVID-19
This article has 18 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Coagulopathy in patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A systematic review and meta-analysis
This article has 4 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Modeling hospital energy and economic costs for COVID-19 infection control interventions
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
In silico comparative genomics of SARS-CoV-2 to determine the source and diversity of the pathogen in Bangladesh
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Testing mobile air purifiers in a school classroom: Reducing the airborne transmission risk for SARS-CoV-2
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Limits and Opportunities of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Tests: An Experienced-Based Perspective
This article has 4 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Lexicon Development for COVID-19-related Concepts Using Open-source Word Embedding Sources: An Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Temporal increase in D614G mutation of SARS-CoV-2 in the Middle East and North Africa
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
The interplay between vaccination and social distancing strategies affects COVID19 population-level outcomes
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Dominant clade‐featured SARS‐CoV‐2 co‐occurring mutations reveal plausible epistasis: An in silico based hypothetical model
This article has 9 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT