ScreenIT
The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Clinical and microbiological assessments of COVID-19 in healthcare workers: a prospective longitudinal study
This article has 21 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
SARS-Cov-2-, HIV-1-, Ebola-neutralizing and anti-PD1 clones are predisposed
This article has 25 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Co-circulation of two viral populations under vaccination
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Immunogenicity and efficacy of the COVID-19 candidate vector vaccine MVA SARS 2 S in preclinical vaccination
This article has 28 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
COVID-19 isolation and containment strategies for ships: Lessons from the USS Theodore Roosevelt outbreak
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Evolution and epidemic spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Brazil
This article has 79 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Genomic Similarity of Nucleotides in SARS CoronaVirus using K-Means Unsupervised Learning Algorithm
This article has 1 author:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
CD127 imprints functional heterogeneity to diversify monocyte responses in human inflammatory diseases
This article has 17 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Inflammatory biomarkers in pregnant women with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study
This article has 10 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Reproduction as a Means of Evaluating Policy Models: A Case Study of a COVID-19 Simulation
This article has 4 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT