The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Coronapp : A web application to annotate and monitor SARS‐CoV‐2 mutations
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Reconstructed signaling and regulatory networks identify potential drugs for SARS-CoV-2 infection
This article has 9 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Covid-19 pandemic and the unprecedented mobilisation of scholarly efforts prompted by a health crisis: Scientometric comparisons across SARS, MERS and 2019-nCoV literature
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Impact of Early Pandemic Stage Mutations on Molecular Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 M pro
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Dose-dependent response to infection with SARS-CoV-2 in the ferret model and evidence of protective immunity
This article has 55 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
SARS-CoV-2 infects and induces cytotoxic effects in human cardiomyocytes
This article has 22 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Minimal system for assembly of SARS-CoV-2 virus like particles
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Targeted intracellular degradation of SARS-CoV-2 via computationally optimized peptide fusions
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
ACE2 and SCARF expression in human dorsal root ganglion nociceptors: implications for SARS-CoV-2 virus neurological effects
This article has 10 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Experimental infection of domestic dogs and cats with SARS-CoV-2: Pathogenesis, transmission, and response to reexposure in cats
This article has 10 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT