Scientific Communication and Education

  1. Free for all, or free-for-all? A content analysis of Australian university open access policies

    1. School of Information and Communication Studies at Charles Sturt University, Australia
    2. Simon Wakeling
    3. Danny Kingsley
    4. Flinders University
    5. Hamid R. Jamali
    6. School of Information and Communication Studies at Charles Sturt University, Australia
    7. Mary Anne Kennan
    8. Maryam Sarrafzadeh
    9. School of Information Science and Knowledge Studies, University of Tehran, Iran

    Reviewed by preLights

    1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity

  2. Supervising the PhD: identifying common mismatches in expectations between candidate and supervisor to improve research training outcomes

    1. Adam P.A. Cardilini
    2. Alice Risely
    3. Mark F. Richardson

    Reviewed by preLights

    1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity

  3. A survey of new PIs in the UK

    1. Sophie E Acton
    2. Andrew JD Bell
    3. Christopher P Toseland
    4. Alison Twelvetrees

    Reviewed by preLights

    1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity

  4. A survey-based analysis of the academic job market

    1. Jason D Fernandes
    2. Sarvenaz Sarabipour
    3. Christopher T Smith
    4. Natalie M Niemi
    5. Nafisa M Jadavji
    6. Ariangela J Kozik
    7. Alex S Holehouse
    8. Vikas Pejaver
    9. Orsolya Symmons
    10. Alexandre W Bisson Filho
    11. Amanda Haage

    Reviewed by preLights

    1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity

  5. From amazing work to I beg to differ - analysis of bioRxiv preprints that received one public comment till September 2019

    1. Mario Malički
    2. Joseph Costello
    3. Juan Pablo Alperin
    4. Lauren A. Maggio

    Reviewed by preLights

    1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity

  6. Woman authorship in pre-print versus peer-reviewed oral health-related publications: A two-year observational study

    1. Lavanya Rajendran
    2. Namita Khandelwal
    3. Jocelyne Feine
    4. Effie Ioannidou

    Reviewed by preLights

    1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity

  7. Co-reviewing and ghostwriting by early-career researchers in the peer review of manuscripts

    1. Gary S McDowell
    2. John D Knutsen
    3. June M Graham
    4. Sarah K Oelker
    5. Rebeccah S Lijek

    Reviewed by preLights

    1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity

  8. Modelling disease transmission from touchscreen user interfaces

    1. Andrew Di Battista
    2. Christos Nicolaides
    3. Orestis Georgiou

    Reviewed by preLights

    1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity

  9. A systematic examination of preprint platforms for use in the medical and biomedical sciences setting

    1. Jamie J Kirkham
    2. Naomi Penfold
    3. Fiona Murphy
    4. Isabelle Boutron
    5. John PA Ioannidis
    6. Jessica K Polka
    7. David Moher

    Reviewed by preLights

    1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity

  10. Transparency in peer review: Exploring the content and tone of reviewers’ confidential comments to editors

    1. Bridget C. O’Brien
    2. Anthony R. Artino
    3. Joseph A. Costello
    4. Erik Driessen
    5. Lauren A. Maggio

    Reviewed by preLights

    1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity
Previous Page 14 of 15 Next