Protocol for a Nationwide Internet-based Health Survey of Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.02.02.21249309: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: The study targeted those who were working and between the ages of 20 and 65 at the time of the baseline survey, and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable Collection of the remaining sample, which consisted of women only, was completed on December 26. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources The survey included work-related questionnaires like the Japanese version of the Job Content Questionnaire[10,11], the Japanese version of the 3-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale … SciScore for 10.1101/2021.02.02.21249309: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: The study targeted those who were working and between the ages of 20 and 65 at the time of the baseline survey, and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable Collection of the remaining sample, which consisted of women only, was completed on December 26. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources The survey included work-related questionnaires like the Japanese version of the Job Content Questionnaire[10,11], the Japanese version of the 3-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale [12,13], and Work Functioning Impairment Scale (WFun)[14], and inquired about frequency of working at home. WFunsuggested: NoneResults from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found one citation with an erratum. We recommend checking the erratum to confirm that it does not impact the accuracy of your citation.
DOI Status Title 10.1038/nature13386 Has erratum CTP synthase 1 deficiency in humans reveals its central role… -
