Detection of spreader nodes in human-SARS-CoV protein-protein interaction network
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (PeerJ)
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
The entire world is witnessing the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19), caused by a novel coronavirus (n-CoV) generally distinguished as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). SARS-CoV-2 promotes fatal chronic respiratory disease followed by multiple organ failure, ultimately putting an end to human life. International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) has reached a consensus that SARS-CoV-2 is highly genetically similar (up to 89%) to the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV), which had an outbreak in 2003. With this hypothesis, current work focuses on identifying the spreader nodes in the SARS-CoV-human protein–protein interaction network (PPIN) to find possible lineage with the disease propagation pattern of the current pandemic. Various PPIN characteristics like edge ratio, neighborhood density, and node weight have been explored for defining a new feature spreadability index by which spreader proteins and protein–protein interaction (in the form of network edges) are identified. Top spreader nodes with a high spreadability index have been validated by Susceptible-Infected-Susceptible (SIS) disease model, first using a synthetic PPIN followed by a SARS-CoV-human PPIN. The ranked edges highlight the path of entire disease propagation from SARS-CoV to human PPIN (up to level-2 neighborhood). The developed network attribute, spreadability index , and the generated SIS model, compared with the other network centrality-based methodologies, perform better than the existing state-of-art.
Article activity feed
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.04.12.038216: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: Please consider improving the rainbow (“jet”) colormap(s) used on page 18. At …
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.04.12.038216: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: Please consider improving the rainbow (“jet”) colormap(s) used on page 18. At least one figure is not accessible to readers with colorblindness and/or is not true to the data, i.e. not perceptually uniform.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-
-