Healthcare worker attendance during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal analysis of fingerprint-verified data from all public-sector secondary and tertiary care facilities in Bangladesh

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.09.01.20186445: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    Although this study has several strengths, such as using longitudinal and nation-wide data of fingerprint-verified attendance at all public-sector secondary and tertiary care facilities in a large LMIC to describe how HCWs are responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, it faces several limitations. First, the data only covered the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh. Given that the virus will likely continue to spread throughout the country, HCW attendance levels may well decline even further in the coming weeks. Second, the data lacked information on HCW attendance at community clinics and other non-public-sector facilities. However, given that most COVID-19 testing and treatment is provided at secondary and tertiary care facilities (all of which are included in this study), our results pertain to those HCWs who are most heavily involved in the COVID-19 response. Third, the data did not allow us to differentiate between voluntary absence (e.g., due to HCWs’ fear of infection) and absence due to sickness. Finally, we lacked data on attendance across units within hospitals. Since HCWs in certain units – particularly emergency departments and intensive care units – are more heavily involved in caring for COVID-19 patients, analyses stratified by units may provide additional insights to attendance associated with occupational exposures and help inform resource allocation within hospitals. Low work attendance by HCWs could become a major obstacle to LMICs’ efforts to co...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.