Dual-Energy Pulsed Field and Radiofrequency Ablation With a Contact Force–Sensing Focal Catheter for Ventricular Arrhythmias: Initial Clinical Experience

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background

Clinical data on ventricular ablation with a contact force–sensing focal catheter capable of delivering both radiofrequency (RF) and pulsed field (PF) energy are limited.

Objective

To describe the procedural characteristics, acute efficacy, and safety of dual-energy ablation with the Dual Energy THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH SF (DE-STSF) catheter in consecutive patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Methods

This observational single-center study included all consecutive patients who underwent catheter ablation of premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) or ventricular tachycardia (VT) with the DE-STSF catheter between June and October 2026.

Results

Twenty-six patients were included (median age 65.5 [55.8–71.0] years; 77% male; median left ventricular ejection fraction 44.0% [30.0–53.8]). Eighteen underwent VT ablation, including 10 with electrical storm or incessant VT and 6 with prior VT ablation; 8 underwent PVC ablation. All patients received RF followed by PF consolidation. Noninducibility of any sustained VT or ventricular fibrillation was achieved in 16/18 VT patients (89%), and acute PVC elimination in all 8 PVC patients. No major procedure-related complications were documented during hospitalization. During a median follow-up of 68 [47–82] days, VT recurred in 2 patients; of whom one patient underwent repeat endocardial and epicardial ablation. No PVC recurrences were documented.

Conclusion

In this initial clinical experience, sequential RF and PF ablation using a single contact force–sensing catheter proved feasible for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias, achieving high acute success with a favorable early safety profile. Whether PF consolidation confers incremental benefit beyond RF ablation alone warrants prospective comparative evaluation.

Clinical Perspective

What is Known

  • Radiofrequency ablation may be limited by ventricular wall thickness and complex scar, and focal pulsed field and dual-energy approaches have been explored in early clinical studies.

  • Clinical evidence is specific to the catheter platform and energy-delivery protocol, and the incremental benefit of sequential RF and PF delivery remains uncertain.

What the Study Adds

  • A sequential RF-first and PF-consolidation workflow with the contact force–sensing DE-STSF catheter was feasible in 26 consecutive patients undergoing VT or PVC ablation, including selected epicardial applications.

  • Acute noninducibility was achieved in 16 of 18 VT patients and acute PVC elimination in all 8 PVC patients; no major in-hospital procedure-related complications were documented, although one transient LV lead parameter change occurred.

  • These encouraging initial results support further prospective evaluation of the DE-STSF catheter for ventricular arrhythmia ablation, with a focus on optimizing energy delivery and assessing long-term efficacy and safety.

Article activity feed