Self-harm incidents and restrictive practice use in an acute female inpatient unit: a service evaluation of a continuous multi-system improvement approach

Read the full article

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background

Self-harm is a frequent and challenging occurrence in adult inpatient psychiatric units. The use of restrictive practice to manage self-harm incidents continues to be widespread within mental health environments despite increasing national and organisational guidance to minimise its use.

Purpose/aim

The aim of this project was to introduce and evaluate a continuous quality improvement programme to progressively reduce incidents of self-harm and the use of restrictive practice. The project was set in a female acute mental health inpatient unit. The project sought to embed improvements in an inpatient unit’s interventions, procedures, and culture and staff’s mindset, and move towards a sustained collaborative and positive therapeutic and communication-based approach.

Methods

A retrospective service evaluation design was employed to assess differences in the number of incidents of self-harm, enhanced observation, seclusion, restraint and rapid tranquillisation in the period following the introduction of a continuous whole-systems multimodal interventional initiative in 2019. Pre- and post-initiation data were compared (2017/18 compared to 2019/2025) to evaluate improvement and whether this had been sustained. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, and means.

Results

Self-harm incidents reduced between 2017/18 and 2019, with a downward trend sustained between 2019 and 2025 (136 to 72 incidents respectively between 2019 and 2025; 47% reduction). A sustained reduction in the use of restrictive practice was shown in all domains pre- and post-initiation (2017/18 compared to 2025).

Clinical implications

No one approach will successfully reduce self-harm and the use of restrictive practice. Approaches employed have to be multi-faceted, multi-interdisciplinary, collaborative, and blend together to deliver improvement. Sustained progress requires commitment to an iterative process of continuous collaboration, improvement and adaptation.

Article activity feed