Urban planning leaves an audible legacy in a megacity’s bird soundscape

Cities are planned for people, yet planning also determines where wildlife persists and where residents hear it. How can this acoustic footprint guide planning and monitoring? We combined AI-powered passive acoustic monitoring at 31 stations with detection-corrected models and spatial validation to map Asian Koel activity across Shenzhen. Koel acoustic opportunity declined with tree and built cover and increased with starling and myna opportunity; host information improved prediction at unmonitored sites. Weekly opportunity expanded in spring and varied across the city; sampled-minute exposure concentrated around dawn. Supported predictions intersected planning-sensitive places, while 51.5% of the city grid remained a monitoring gap. We translated these boundaries into monitoring priorities for underrepresented environments and uncertain spring predictions. This reproducible workflow reveals the acoustic imprint of the present-day urban landscape and connects ecological diagnosis, prediction boundaries and adaptive monitoring to inform urban coexistence.