Morphometric Brain Networks at Ultra-Low Field: A First Assessment of Feasibility and Reliability
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
Ultra-low field (ULF) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers accessible point-of-care neuroimag-ing, yet its capability to support multivariate network analyses remains understudied.
Methods
We systematically evaluated the feasibility and reliability of Morphometric Similarity Networks (MSN) and Morphometric Inverse Divergence (MIND) networks derived from paired high-field (HF, 3T/1.5T) and ULF (64mT) scans in a primary cohort (N=23) and an independent replication cohort (N=19). We tested the impact of super-resolution processing, cortical parcellation granularity (Desikan-Killiany vs. Destrieux), and mesh resolution (fsnative vs. fsaverage5) on edge-level cross-scanner agreement (Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient, CCC) and subject-level identifiability.
Results
MIND networks demonstrated higher edge-level HF-ULF agreement (mean CCC = 0.95) and ULF reproducibility (mean CCC = 0.98) compared to MSNs (mean CCC = 0.86-0.87 and 0.91-0.94, respectively). In contrast, MSNs yielded higher subject-level differential identifiability across field strengths due to a broader dis-tinction between within- and between-subject similarity. Reconstructing MIND networks on native high-resolution meshes (fsnative) maximised cross-scanner agreement, whereas coarser meshes and finer cortical parcellations enhanced individual network identifiability.
Conclusions
Structural similarity networks can be reliably constructed from ULF MRI data. Optimal analytic choices depend on study objectives: MIND on native meshes maximises cross-scanner stability, whereas MSNs excel at preserving individual uniqueness, paving the way for globally scalable connectomic research.
