Virtual Noncontrast Imaging with Deep-Silicon Photon-Counting CT: Matched Phantom and Initial Human Evaluation

Objectives

To compare virtual noncontrast (VNC) error between deep-silicon photon-counting CT (PCCT) and dual-energy energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) in a matched phantom and characterize tissue-specific error in humans.

Materials and methods

This prospective exploratory study included a matched phantom experiment and pilot human evaluation. Prototype projection-domain water-density maps served as the VNC surrogate. Twenty-four vials containing 0.1–20 mg I/mL in deionized water or simulated blood were scanned with PCCT and EID-CT. Three men underwent true noncontrast and contrast-enhanced PCCT; 80 matched measurements were analyzed. Paired t tests and mixed-effects models assessed system differences and iodine associations.

Results

Three participants (mean age, 67 ± 10 years; all men) were included. Mean VNC error was 29.1 HU lower with PCCT than EID-CT (95% CI, 15.5–42.7 HU; p < 0.001). Error was not associated with iodine concentration for PCCT (slope, 0.03 HU per mg I/mL; 95% CI, −0.92 to 0.98; p = 0.95) but increased for EID-CT (slope, 3.51 HU per mg I/mL; 95% CI, 2.56–4.46; p < 0.001). The slopes differed by 3.48 HU per mg I/mL ( p < 0.001). In humans, errors in five non-blood-pool tissues were within 5 HU. Error was not associated with iodine concentration among 61 non-blood-pool measurements (adjusted slope, −0.17 HU per mg I/mL; 95% CI, −1.22 to 0.88; p = 0.75).

Conclusion

PCCT provided VNC measurements with errors closer to zero and less dependent on iodine than EID-CT in the phantom. In humans, error was generally small in non-blood-pool tissues and was not associated with iodine concentration.

Key Points