Lymphatic Spread Patterns in HPV+ vs. HPV− Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multi-Center European Analysis
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
Human papillomavirus (HPV)–positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) shows higher prevalence of lymph node metastases than HPV-negative OPSCC. It remains unclear whether HPV-positive and HPV-negative OPSCC differ in occult metastasis risk, which is relevant to personalize elective nodal treatment volumes.
Methods
We performed a retrospective analysis of 780 untreated OPSCC patients from four European centers. Patterns of lymph node level involvement (LNLs I, II, III, IV, V, VII) were assessed using a consensus diagnosis integrating imaging (CT, MRI, PET) and pathological findings from surgically treated patients. Occult metastases were assessed in 288 surgical patients with paired clinical and pathological information.
Results
HPV-positive patients more frequently presented with ipsilateral LNL II involvement, particularly in early T-stage disease (80.6% [75.6–84.8] vs. 54.8% [47.2–62.2]). However, the probability of downstream involvement in LNLs III and IV conditioned on upstream LNL involvement was similar between HPV-positive and HPV-negative patients. Similarly, contralateral involvement conditioned on midline extension of the primary tumor was similar. The overall proportion of occult metastases, defined as clinically false-negative LNLs divided by pathologically positive LNLs, was lower in HPV-positive patients (24.7% [19.7–30.1] vs. 48.7% [39.7–57.8]).
Conclusions
HPV-positive OPSCC showed higher prevalence of LNL involvement, especially in ipsilateral LNL II and early T-stage tumors. The data to directly compare occult metastasis risk has important limitations and does not allow definitive conclusions. However, the presented data suggests that higher prevalence likely does not translate into higher risk of occult metastases for the most common clinical diagnoses and therefore does not support larger elective nodal treatment volumes compared with HPV-negative tumors.
