Comparing Deep Learning Models for Lung Nodule Detection on Photon-Counting CT Images in a Non-Screening Setting
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
Comprehensive evaluations of lung nodule detection methods remain limited, particularly regarding data from clinical routine, novel photon-counting CT (PCCT) technology, and the comparison of academic and commercial models.
Materials and Methods
This retrospective study collected 1860 routine PCCT scans acquired at Hannover Medical School from 2021 to 2024. We compared four deep-learning-based lung nodule detection models, which were developed for conventional CT, namely the publicly available TotalSegmentator, nnDetection, and RadYOLO methods, as well as a commercial lung computer-aided detection (CAD) system. We evaluated the inter-model agreement in an unannotated cohort (n=1699), sensitivity in a smaller cohort of 25 manually annotated scans, and false positives as detections in 136 report-negative scans.
Results
In the unannotated cohort, the commercial CAD system detected 7071, TotalSegmentator 4264, nnDetection 5254, and RadYOLO 3122 nodules. Overall, the inter-model agreement was low, and the models produced substantially different candidate nodules. Approximately 1300 nodules were detected by all models, representing 18.7% - 42.8% of each model’s detections. 15.4% - 37.4% of a model’s detections did not match any other model. The models showed moderate sensitivity (between 0.71, 95%-CI [0.64, 0.77], and 0.83, 95%-CI [0.77, 0.88]), and TotalSegmentator and RadYOLO produced few false positives per scan (both 0.85, 95%-CI [0.70, 1.02]).
Conclusion
The lung nodules detected by four deep learning models showed high variation and a lack of consensus on clinical PCCT data. These findings highlight the importance of model benchmarking and local validation when deploying models in real-world clinical workflows.
