Reporting Odds Ratio Analysis of Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy Regimens for Biliary and Pancreatic Cancer: Population-Level Toxicity Signals and Hypotheses for High-Altitude Generalizability

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background

Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy is first-line for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but toxicity patterns are poorly defined at high altitude (>2,000 m). Clinical observations of heightened treatment toxicity at our high-altitude institution (Xining, ∼2,261 m) prompted this population-level baseline study of gemcitabine toxicity signals. The present analysis uses only publicly available, de-identified FAERS data; institutional clinical experience motivates but does not validate the signals reported here.

Methods

Four-metric disproportionality analysis (ROR primary, PRR, IC BCPNN, EBGM MGPS) of FAERS 2014–2026 (18.37M reports) across five non-exclusive gemcitabine groups (monotherapy, +ICI, +TKI, triple, BTC/PDAC disease-specific). Liver toxicity stratified into three MedDRA PT groups; fatal toxicity analyzed with dual definitions. BTC/PDAC queried via correct patient.drug.drugindication field. BH-FDR post hoc. EBGM used two implementations: a non-standard single-pair γ(1,1) closed-form approximation (positivity-screening column in S1) and the standard openEBGM two-component MGPS. Complete-MGPS EB05 > 2 is the primary Bayesian criterion (10/17 pass); closed-form count (12/17) is labeled non-standard.

Results

14/17 exposure–AE combinations passed the three frequentist criteria (ROR/PRR/IC lower bounds); 10/17 additionally passed complete-MGPS EB05 > 2 (standard openEBGM caers fit). The non-standard closed-form count (12/17) is a labeled approximation only. Myelosuppression is the most consistent signal across all regimens (ROR 3.35–7.74); under complete MGPS the sparse all-role triple-combination cell had EB05=1.59. Triple combo liver toxicity (ROR=10.32, a=28, n=181 all-role) is driven by the Severe failure–hepatitis PT group (ROR=23.51); this cell is unstable under primary-suspect restriction (ROR=1.62, a=0, n=31; Supplementary S9) and is hypothesis-generating. Restricted→expanded fatal bridge: triple ROR 1.62→4.64 (zero overlap verified). BTC/PDAC thrombocytopenia (ROR=19.36) was independently reproduced at 19.70 after deduplication/PS filtering; PPV=94%.

Conclusions

This study establishes baseline gemcitabine toxicity signals from a largely sea-level FAERS population. The fatal-liver-failure bridge and PT-stratified liver toxicity are hypothesis-generating signals. High-altitude hypotheses are mechanistic and not FAERS-testable; they require prospective validation.

Article activity feed