Empirical antibacterial use, escalation, microbiological profile, and outcomes in febrile neutropenia: An ambispective observational study
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
Febrile neutropenia requires rapid empirical antibiotic therapy, with regimen selection shaped by local prescribing practice and pathogen patterns. We described starting treatment, later drug changes, microbiological findings, and inpatient outcomes.
Methods
This ambispective cohort comprised 96 episodes from 90 patients admitted to a tertiary-level teaching hospital. Treatment and outcome analyses used each episode as the unit of observation. Recorded variables included the starting antibiotics, later regimen modification, microbiology, hospitalization length, invasive fungal infection (IFI) as captured in study records, and disposition. Comparisons based on escalation status were exploratory.
Result
Cefoperazone-sulbactam appeared in 62/96 initial regimens (64.6%), amikacin in 42 (43.8%), teicoplanin in 28 (29.2%), and meropenem in 14 (14.6%). Eighteen episodes (18.8%) required a change that broadened or substituted antibacterial therapy. Among 31 microbiologically documented infections, 22 (71.0%) yielded Gram-negative organisms and 9 (29.0%) were polymicrobial. Median length of admission was 18.5 days in the escalation group and 9 days in the remainder (p<0.001). Mortality was 27.8% (5/18) with escalation and 5.1% (4/78) without it (p=0.011), with nine inhospital deaths overall (9.4%).
Conclusion
Antibacterial management differed within this cohort, with treatment escalation required in 18 of 96 episodes. Gram-negative organisms comprised most microbiologically confirmed infections. Escalation marked a clinically complex course with prolonged hospitalization and greater observed mortality; the observational design does not establish comparative efficacy or causation.
