Divergent Eosinophilic and Paradoxical Inflammatory Adverse-Event Signatures Across Five Type 2 Asthma Biologics: A FAERS Active-Comparator Disproportionality Analysis
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
Five biologics target sequential nodes of the type 2 (T2) inflammatory axis in severe asthma and have each been anecdotally linked to eosinophilic or paradoxical inflammatory adverse events. Whether these reflect a class effect or drug-specific signatures is untested.
Methods
We performed a case-noncase disproportionality analysis of FAERS, 2022–2024. Asthma-indication reports naming tezepelumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, or omalizumab as primary suspect were compared against the pooled other four (active-comparator design) across 7 pre-specified eosinophilic, vasculitic (including EGPA), cutaneous, and ocular outcomes. A signal was robust if the reporting odds ratio (ROR) 95% CI lower bound exceeded 1 and a Bayesian criterion was also met.
Results
Among 50,360 reports (dupilumab n=29,652; mepolizumab n=8,846; omalizumab n=5,484; benralizumab n=4,372; tezepelumab n=2,006), benralizumab showed robust signals for EGPA (ROR 5.06), vasculitis (ROR 4.60), and peripheral eosinophilia (ROR 1.80). Mepolizumab showed a robust vasculitis signal (ROR 1.85); its similarly sized EGPA association narrowly missed the robustness criterion despite significance after correction for multiple testing. Dupilumab showed no EGPA/vasculitis excess but a robust ocular-inflammation signal (ROR 7.81). Tezepelumab and omalizumab showed no robust signal in any domain. EGPA/vasculitis onset occurred earlier after dupilumab (median 20–44 days) than anti-IL-5-axis agents (median 195–550 days; p≤0.012); mepolizumab’s signal did not reproduce over the full 2015–2024 window (calendar-time confounding).
Conclusion
FAERS active-comparator analysis reveals drug-specific, not class-uniform, adverse-event reporting patterns: anti-IL-5-axis agents disproportionately report EGPA/vasculitis, and dupilumab disproportionately reports ocular inflammation with markedly earlier onset. These hypothesis-generating signals cannot establish causality and require confirmation through case-level or comparative pharmacoepidemiological studies.
