Mixtures of stably coexisting species overyield
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Diverse plant communities usually produce more biomass than monocultures, an advantage that strengthens over time and is attributed mainly to the complementarity effect - the extra biomass produced, relative to monocultures, when species exploit different resources, share fewer enemies or facilitate one another. Yet whether this advantage is a mere tendency of diverse communities, or something that every persistent community must have, has remained unknown. Here we show that stable coexistence requires a positive complementarity effect, with vanishingly rare exceptions, and that underyielding communities are significantly more likely to lose a species within two years or sampling steps, across four long-term biodiversity experiments, with odds of losing a species nearly three times higher than in other communities. In the twenty-five years since the complementarity effect was defined, the link between biodiversity effects and species coexistence had only been established theoretically for two species in competition or observed as a correlation; our theoretical result makes it a general property of multispecies communities, in which the complementarity effect scales with two established measures of how securely species coexist - local and structural stability. Our analyses are, to our knowledge, the first to test a coexistence prediction - impending species loss - prospectively in biodiversity experiments, from a functioning measure alone, turning a measure of what diversity does into a diagnostic of whether diversity can persist. Stable coexistence and higher productivity are thus intrinsically linked: biodiversity does not merely benefit ecosystem production on average; biodiversity that endures cannot but benefit it through complementarity. We anticipate that this diagnostic will turn existing biodiversity experiments, sown grasslands and intercrops into early-warning systems for species loss, since it requires only the biomass of each species in mixture and in monoculture - data these systems already collect, and that agronomists already combine into the land equivalent ratio - and that it will extend to forests, through the growing networks of tree diversity experiments and mixed-species plantations where the same measurements are made.