Quantitative Gait Analysis in a Sheep Model of In-Utero Spina Bifida Repair

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate quantitative gait analysis in a sheep model ( Ovis aries ) of in-utero spina bifida repair.

Method

Using a 3D marker-based motion capture system, we quantified spatiotemporal gait parameters and hindlimb joint angles in a sheep model of in-utero spina bifida repair and normal controls. A linear support vector machine classifier, trained and tested on subject-disjoint partitions with individual gait cycles as the unit of analysis, evaluated the relationship between hindlimb joint angles and clinician-assigned Texas Spinal Cord Injury Scale scores. Linear mixed-effects models compared spatiotemporal parameters, hoof height, and hip drop across 3- to 6-month evaluations and between groups.

Results

In treated (n=14) and control (n=3) lambs, front- and hindlimb gait speed differed by timepoint (both p=0.025). Across 1,632 left and 1,661 right hindlimb gait cycles, held-out classification accuracy was 85.9% and 88.6% (Cohen’s κ=0.78 and 0.84) for left and right hindlimbs, respectively, against majority-class proportions of 76.5% and 75%. Left hindlimb hip drop differed between treated lambs and controls (Δ=0.8 cm, p=0.027). Between-group contrasts were considered exploratory given the small control group.

Conclusion

Quantitative gait analysis was feasible in an in-utero spina bifida repair model. Hindlimb kinematic profiles classified clinical ambulation scores above the majority-class baseline.

What’s already known about this topic?

  • Independent walking is a major benefit of in-utero spina bifida repair surgery and a driver of treatment innovation.

  • Ambulation after in-utero repair is typically assessed using subjective clinical assessments, which limits the ability to evaluate the effect of treatment.

  • Instrumented gait analysis enables precise evaluation of ambulatory function in three-dimensional movements but has not yet been implemented in models of in-utero spina bifida repair.

What does this study add?

  • We objectively quantified spatiotemporal gait parameters and hindlimb kinematic profiles over serial assessments in an established sheep model of in-utero spina bifida repair using a three-dimensional motion capture system.

  • Hindlimb kinematic profiles classified clinician-assigned Texas Spinal Cord Injury Scale scores with 85.9%–88.6% accuracy, above the 75%–76.5% majority-class baseline. Pastern kinematics contributed most to classification.

  • Treated lambs’ gait deviated from controls mainly during swing and mid-stance phases (exploratory).

Article activity feed