Structural conservation of the gabapentinoid binding site in human and Caenorhabditis elegans α2δ subunits: a docking and molecular dynamics perspective

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Pain is a global health burden, highlighting the need for effective therapeutic strategies. Gabapentin (GBP) and pregabalin (PGB), used for neuropathic pain, act primarily through α2δ auxiliary subunits of voltage-gated calcium channels. Caenorhabditis elegans expresses UNC-36, an ortholog of mammalian α2δ proteins involved in calcium-channel function and nocifensive behavior. However, whether UNC-36 preserves the molecular features required for gabapentinoid recognition remains unclear. We compared human α2δ-1 and UNC-36 using sequence and structural analyses, molecular docking, 500-ns molecular dynamics simulations, interaction profiling, principal component and free-energy landscape analyses, and MM/GBSA calculations. UNC-36 preserved the overall architecture of the mammalian gabapentinoid-binding region despite substantial sequence divergence, and both ligands remained associated with the modeled pockets. However, residue-level interaction networks differed between species. Human α2δ-1 showed greater contributions from aromatic interactions, whereas UNC-36 relied more prominently on cationic and hydrogen-bond donor interactions mediated by Arg501 and Arg503. The human α2δ-1–PGB complex maintained the most stable ligand pose, whereas α2δ-1–GBP showed greater positional variation. In UNC-36, PGB exhibited greater deviation from its initial binding pose than GBP. The first two principal components accounted for more conformational variance in UNC-36 complexes than in human complexes. MM/GBSA estimates showed that PGB was energetically favored over GBP in human α2δ-1, whereas GBP was favored over PGB in UNC-36. These findings show that conservation of the gabapentinoid-binding architecture is accompanied by species-specific differences in interaction chemistry, conformational dynamics, and estimated binding energetics, providing a molecular basis for interpreting C. elegans gabapentinoid responses in a translational context.

Article activity feed