Noninvasive Wound Swab Proteomics Enables Prognostic Stratification of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing: The HEAL-DFU Proof-of-Concept Study

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objective

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) affect up to 34% of people with diabetes and precede 80% of lower extremity amputations, yet no ulcer-level molecular biomarkers distinguish healing trajectories. We aimed to identify wound swab proteins associated with DFU healing time and characterize their prognostic potential.

Research Design and Methods

LC-MS/MS proteomics was performed on wound swabs from 112 people with diabetes presenting with new DFUs, followed for up to 6 months. Participants were divided into fast-healers (≤40), slow-healers (41-180 days) and chronic wounds (>180 days). Proteins associated with “time to healing” were identified using Firth-penalized Cox regression (FDR<0.2; HR<1 indicated slow healing) and used to construct a cross-validated Protein Healing Score (PHS). Sensitivity and causal mediation analyses examined clinical variable effects on protein abundance, with independent dataset validation.

Results

Participants had a mean (±SD) age of 67.5 (±12.3) years, and diabetes duration of 27.5 (±14.9) years. Twenty-seven proteins formed two clusters: a slow-healing cluster enriched in neutrophil granule and innate immune proteins (HR<1), and a fast-healing cluster enriched in proteostatic stress proteins (HR>1). Triglyceride levels differed between healing groups (p=0.001); seven slow-healing proteins showed triglyceride-mediated effects (21–28%), suggesting a dyslipidaemia–innate immunity axis. The PHS significantly stratified prognosis (adjusted HR=1.47, 95%CI 1.14–1.89; p=0.003), outperforming clinical variables alone (AUC-OVR 0.71 vs. 0.62). Transcriptomic validation confirmed directional concordance.

Conclusions

Wound swab proteomics at DFU onset identified a 27-protein healing signature linked to neutrophil–innate immunity and triglyceride associated dyslipidaemia, offering a potential non-invasive prognostic tool.

Highlights

  • Why did we undertake this study?

    No prior study has examined wound swab protein associations with DFU healing time as a continuous outcome, offering finer prognostic resolution than discrete healing categories.

  • What is the specific question(s) we wanted to answer?

    Can wound swab proteins at DFU presentation predict healing trajectories, and do clinical factors mediate these associations?

  • What did we find?

    Twenty-seven proteins formed two prognostic clusters: a slow-healing cluster enriched in neutrophil/innate immune proteins and a fast-healing cluster linked to proteostatic stress. A Protein Healing Score outperformed clinical variables in stratifying healing outcomes (AUC-OVR 0.71 vs. 0.62). Triglyceride-mediated and neuropathy-driven effects on wound proteins revealed mechanistic links to impaired healing.

  • What are the implications of our findings?

    Wound swab proteomics offers a non-invasive prognostic tool at DFU onset, potentially enabling earlier targeted intervention.

Article activity feed