Ultrasound vs. MRI Assessment of Rotator Cuff Tear Severity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Supraspinatus Tears
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Objective
Rotator cuff tears involving the supraspinatus tendon are a common cause of shoulder pain. Ultrasound (US) is accessible, dynamic, and lower cost than MRI, but diagnostic performance may vary by tear severity, operator expertise. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the US with MRI for supraspinatus tear detection.
Methods
MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL Plus were searched for studies published from January 2015 to June 2026. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. Diagnostic outcomes included sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, NPV. Meta-analyses were performed separately for any, partial-thickness, and full-thickness tears when complete 2 × 2 data were available.
Results
23 studies comprising 1,452 participants were included. US demonstrated stronger and more consistent performance for full-thickness than partial-thickness tears. Mean sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 88.5%, 95.2%, and 93.4%, respectively, for full-thickness tears, compared with 71.5%, 91.5%, and 79.2% for partial-thickness tears. HSROC analysis showed pooled sensitivity and specificity of 96% and 76% for any tear, 94% and 80% for partial-thickness tears, and 96% and 98% for full-thickness tears. Agreement measures also generally favored full-thickness tears. Operator expertise, study quality varied, and only one study evaluated a handheld ultrasound system.
Conclusion
Ultrasound demonstrates strong diagnostic performance for supraspinatus tears, particularly full-thickness tears, while partial-thickness tears remain more challenging. Given the high observed sensitivity, well-performed US may serve as a practical first-line modality to rule out full-thickness tears, with MRI remaining complementary for equivocal partial-thickness tears, associated pathology, and preoperative assessment.
