THE PROBOSCIS SENSORY INDEX PREDICTS VECTOR ANTHROPOPHILY AND HOST SELECTION IN NORTHERN NIGERIA

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background

Unexplained spatial heterogeneity in field-observed Human Blood Index (HBI) hinders vector-borne disease control. We synthesized micro-morphological sensory structure densities across primary disease vectors to formulate a novel Proboscis Sensory Index (PSI) from micro-morphological sensory structure densities to evaluate its capacity to predict vector anthropophily, zooprophylactic modulation, and spatial transmission risk across Northern Nigeria.

Methods

A systematic review of 42 studies (N = 18,647 blood-fed mosquitoes across 126 georeferenced sites, 2005–2025) synthesized baseline species-specific PSI metrics from electron microscopy sensilla counts. A multi-variable binomial Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) evaluated interactions between PSI, livestock, human density, and environmental covariates. Predictive accuracy was validated against field-derived Entomological Inoculation Rates (EIR) and historical outbreak records.

Results

The overall pooled HBI was 0.642 (95% CI: 0.588 – 0.694), exhibiting significant variation across the Sudan (0.728), Guinea (0.615), and Sahel (0.584) savannas. Species-specific PSI values graded from Anopheles gambiae s.s. (8.91 ± 0.34), Anopheles funestus (8.12 ± 0.38), and Anopheles arabiensis (7.68 ± 0.41) to Culex quinquefasciatus (4.87 ± 0.52). In GLMM analysis, PSI was the strongest predictor of anthropophily (β = 0.89, aOR = 2.44, 95% CI: 2.32 – 2.56, p < 0.001), with fixed effects explaining 78% of total field variance (Marginal R 2 = 0.78). High-PSI species maintained elevated anthropophily regardless of livestock availability, whereas low-PSI species displayed steep zooprophylactic diversion (ΔHBI = −0.71, p < 0.001) under high cattle density. Incorporating PSI reduced localized EIR prediction error by 64.2% (RMSE = 15.0 vs. 41.8 infective bites/person/month), and high-resolution (1 km2) predictive mapping correctly identified 87.1% (27/31) of historically documented outbreak Local Government Areas.

Conclusion

Micro-sensory organ density dictates vector host preference and livestock-mediated zooprophylactic potential. Integrating PSI into spatial models resolves localized transmission heterogeneity, guiding targeted vector control prioritizing indoor residual spraying and dual-ingredient nets in high-PSI foci, while leveraging endectocides and larval management in low-PSI pastoral corridors.

Article activity feed