A Temporal Reliability and Sustainability Score Framework for Ranking Heart Rate Variability Metrics During Pharmacological Autonomic Blockade in Rats
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
While Heart Rate Variability (HRV) is a cornerstone of non-invasive autonomic assessment, the sensitivity and sustainability of specific HRV parameters remain debated. This study introduces a “sustainability score” to systematically validate which metrics best reflect autonomic nervous system (ANS) modulation following pharmacological blockade.
Methods
Ten male Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with ECG electrodes. After recovery, rats underwent randomized atropine (1 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) and propranolol (10 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) sessions separated by at least 3 days. Baseline ECG was recorded for 30 min before each session, followed by 90-min post-drug ECG recording. HRV parameters were analyzed in sequential 15-min and 30-min segments. Reliability was assessed using average p-values across post-drug segments and a sustainability score, defined as the number of segments significantly different from baseline.
Results
After atropine, HF Power showed the strongest rapid parasympathetic-related response in 15-min segments, with the lowest average p-value (0.1476) and highest sustainability score (4), followed by RSA (p=0.16148; score=4). HFn was less reliable in 15-min segments (p=0.23147; score=2) but became the most reliable parasympathetic-related metric in 30-min segments (p=0.0001; score=3). After propranolol, SI was the most reliable sympathetic-related metric in both 15-min (p=0.18225; score=2) and 30-min segments (p=0.0393; score=2), while SD2/SD1 showed the strongest 30-min sympathovagal-balance response (p=0.0200; score=3).
Conclusion
HF Power is recommended for rapid parasympathetic-related assessment in short windows, HFn for longer-window parasympathetic assessment, SI for sympathetic-assessment, and SD2/SD1 for 30-min sympathovagal-balance analysis. Sustainability scoring provides a structured framework for selecting ECG-derived autonomic markers.
