Malnutrition Diagnosis: Validation of a Weight-Independent “GLIM-Adapted” Framework in U.S. Adults (NHANES 1999–2020)
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) consensus standardized malnutrition diagnosis, but incorporating low Body Mass Index (BMI) as a phenotypic criterion introduces a “circularity bias” in weight-stratified analyses and conceals “hidden hunger” in high-obesity populations. Using nationally representative data from the U.S. NHANES 1999–2020 (N = 23,363 adults), we propose a “GLIM-adapted” framework that excludes BMI—relying solely on weight loss and DXA-derived appendicular lean mass index (ALMI). Standard GLIM identified an 18.9% malnutrition prevalence, but low BMI was the sole indispensable phenotypic driver for only 233 individuals (5.2%). The GLIM-adapted framework maintained a highly comparable prevalence of 17.9% (n = 4,038). Thus, low BMI exhibits low diagnostic sensitivity in modern U.S. cohorts. Excluding BMI successfully bypasses circularity, unmasks qualitative muscle wasting under excess body weight, and establishes a robust, weight-independent standard for clinical and epidemiological research.