How far can microbial monocultures predict growth in multi-strain communities?
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Previous research in microbes successfully predicted biculture growth based on monoculture growth curves. Still, the usual model-based approach does not seem to extend to communities involving more than two bacterial strains. Here, we use a model-blind machine-learning approach to predict community-wide yield, area under the growth curve, maximum relative growth rate and its timing in communities involving up to five strains of Escherichia coli . First, we identify the highest per-capita growth rate and its timing in monocultures as major predictors of multi-strain community growth. Next, we show that a random forest trained on communities involving a low number of strains is able to predict the outcomes of communities involving a higher number of strains. Finally, we reveal diminishing returns in using more and more complex communities in order to predict the behaviour of a higher-level community, because monoculture- and biculture-based growth predictions are often already accurate. This finding relativises the need for experiments involving high numbers of strains when studying the growth dynamics of multi-strain communities.
Author summary
It is possible to predict how two bacterial species grow when we culture them together, based on how each species grows in isolation. However, common approaches do not work when more species are cultured together. In this study, we use machine learning methods to study how the predictability of collective growth behaves, according to patterns and aspects learned from the growth of subcommunities in isolation. We show that community-wide growth is significantly impacted by which species reaches the earliest a critical per-capita growth rate when introduced in a fresh culture medium. We also find that most of the predictability stems from knowing single-species behaviour as well as species pairs. This result suggests that it is not necessary to investigate all intermediate subcommunity levels to predict how the full community grows.