Alzheimer’s Polygenic Risk Scores Are Not Interchangeable: Evidence from 1,752 Models
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Introduction
Polygenic risk scores (PRS) may improve Alzheimer’s disease (AD) risk prediction before symptom onset, yet choosing an appropriate model can be challenging.
Methods
Using the standardized GenoPred pipeline, 1,752 PRS models (9 algorithms; 584 configurations; 3 genome-wide association studies) were evaluated and stratified by genetic ancestry and APOE diplotype. PRS models were evaluated using 11,200 clinical or autopsy-confirmed AD cases and 19,321 controls age ≥65 from the Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project Release 5.
Results
PRS results were not consistent across methodologies (Spearman’s ρ: –0.49 to 1), with >95% of individuals having PRS in both the top and bottom risk deciles. Top-performing PRS were effective at stratifying AD risk across ancestries (AFR: P =2.04×10 - 26 ; AMR: P =4.57×10 -21 ; EAS: P =6.21×10 -40 ; EUR: P =7.90×10 -187 ).
Discussion
PRS parameters should be optimized for each ancestry. Contradictory signals across methodologies underscore the need for carefully choosing suitable PRS methods and fine-tuning algorithmic parameters to ensure accuracy and consistency.
Data Availability
Access to the ADSP is controlled by The National Institute on Aging Genetics of Alzheimer’s Disease (NIAGADS). All scripts used to analyze the data are freely available at https://github.com/jmillerlab/prs_comparisons .
