Background proteome correction promotes confident identification of dynamic protein-protein interactions between different biological contexts

Affinity purification-mass spectrometry (AP-MS) enables the characterization of protein-protein interactions (PPIs), and the ease and sensitivity of such experiments has progressively increased. Beyond steady-state interactions of target proteins, a strong interest has emerged in monitoring how PPIs change upon significant biological perturbations, such as in disease contexts or small molecule modulation of the target protein. These perturbations likely not only induce PPI changes but can also lead to altered expression of proteins not of direct interest. Changes in protein abundance may alter which proteins adsorb to the affinity purification matrix, and due to the sensitivity of modern mass spectrometers, these differential “background binders” can masquerade as differential interactors. Contemporary approaches often do not account for differences in the background proteome, potentially inflating the number of false positives and negatives reported. Here, we provide technical considerations for the reliable annotation of dynamic PPIs, using the O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT) as a case study. We describe the installation of affinity epitope tags on endogenous OGT in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs), which we then apply for OGT interactor identification via AP-MS. We show that accurate representation of the bead background, which depends on the affinity matrix in use, is critical for elimination of false positive and false negative PPIs. This became even more pertinent as OGT PPI dynamics were measured under OGT catalytic inhibition via OSMI-4, which is known to perturb gene expression. The proteomes of OSMI-4-treated and control-treated mESCs differed, leading to distinct bead backgrounds in which the differential background proteins appeared as interaction gains or losses. These false positives were resolved by incorporating straightforward experimental controls through a practical statistical framework, allowing for a direct and confident comparison between treatment conditions. Incorporating these considerations into workflows investigating PPI dynamics will improve data fidelity and reproducibility.