Sleep and Overnight Cardiovascular Outcomes During the First Week on a Temperature-Controlled Sleep Surface: Stratified by Baseline Performance

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Temperature-controlled sleep surfaces are used nightly by hundreds of thousands of people. Despite mass adoption, subjective reports of sleep quality have not yet been substantiated with objective measurements; whether differences in individual baseline sleep contribute to overall efficacy remains unknown. Cohort means aggregate individuals with qualitatively different sleep deficits, and a benefit concentrated in the impaired can vanish when averaged against those already sleeping well.

In an open-label study of 171 adults, we examined wearable-derived sleep and overnight cardiovascular endpoints during programmed change of a thermal-controlled sleep surface across seven baseline and seven thermally regulated nights. Participants were classified on baseline performance, separately for each endpoint, rather than averaged as a single group.

Cohort-wide, total sleep time increased 7.3 minutes (95% CI 1.7 to 12.8, p = 0.010), average nocturnal heart rate fell 1.79 bpm and minimum heart rate 1.75 bpm (both p < 0.001), and heart rate variability rose 3.25 ms (p = 0.001). Stratification revealed a baseline-dependent pattern. The most-deficient quartile gained 9.6% in total sleep time, 19.4% in REM, 13.1% in deep sleep, and 15.6% in HRV, all p < 0.001, and wake after sleep onset fell 26% in the most fragmented quartile (−16.3 minutes, p < 0.001).

Objective gains were largest where the baseline deficit was greatest. Controlled trials are needed to validate these findings.

Article activity feed