Defining severe acute respiratory infection hospitalisations for national register-based surveillance in Finland, 2022-2025

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background

Severe acute respiratory infections (SARI) strain healthcare systems. Sentinel surveillance remains central to SARI monitoring, but routinely collected hospital discharge data offer a scalable, population-wide complement. In Finland, national registers now enable register-based surveillance, yet SARI case definitions remain unevaluated.

Aim

To evaluate whether routinely collected electronic health records can support register-based SARI surveillance and establish a national case definition.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective register-based study linking inpatient discharge data from the Finnish Care Register for Health Care (Hilmo) and laboratory-confirmed pathogen notifications from the National Infectious Diseases Register (NIDR). Admissions were aggregated into hospitalisation episodes using generic and pathogen-specific respiratory ICD-10 codes and linked to laboratory-confirmed respiratory pathogens within an admission-centred window. We assessed the impact of diagnostic coding position, laboratory linkage windows and alternative case definitions on age distribution, seasonality and epidemic trend detection.

Results

We included 145,435 respiratory hospitalisation episodes. Laboratory confirmations clustered around admission, and a −7-to-+3-day window was selected; 51,498 (35.4%) had a linked laboratory confirmation. Specific primary-position diagnoses preserved clear seasonality and age distributions consistent with SARI epidemiology, whereas secondary-position diagnoses showed attenuated seasonality. A combined case definition incorporating specific primary diagnoses and laboratory-supported syndromic episodes produced stable epidemic curves while improving sensitivity over laboratory confirmation alone.

Conclusion

National discharge and laboratory registers can support robust SARI surveillance in Finland when case definitions are carefully designed. A combined register-based definition balances specificity, sensitivity and feasibility, complementing sentinel surveillance and integrated respiratory monitoring.

Article activity feed