Integrative optical genome mapping and long-read sequencing resolve constitutional complex rearrangements at nucleotide resolution

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Complex rearrangements are one of the rarest types of structural variants (SVs) and can be divided into two categories: complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCRs) and complex genomic rearrangements (CGRs). CCRs include structural rearrangements that present at least three breakpoints and show exchange of genetic material between more than two chromosomes and CGRs are rearrangements that present more than one junction and/or more than one SV in cis . They are usually formed by one of the chromoanagenesis mechanisms, where a massive disruptive cellular event leads to multiple structural rearrangements. Classical cytogenomic techniques have been commonly applied for their characterization, but methodologies that involve longer DNA molecules, namely optical genome mapping (OGM) and long-read genome sequencing (lrGS), present a considerably higher SV detection resolution, revealing more details about the rearrangements, including precise breakpoint location. Here, we describe six patients with complex rearrangements investigated through a combination of different techniques: karyotyping, chromosomal microarray, and OGM were performed to characterize the rearrangements. Subsequently, lrGS was used to further resolve the alterations, refine their breakpoints’ location, and sequence their junction points. Three patients presented CCRs involving three, four, and six chromosomes, while three exhibited CGRs involving one different chromosome each, providing a variety of complex SVs to show the importance of each technique and their combination in rearrangement resolution. In total, the complex rearrangements presented 127 breakpoints, 66 junction points and involved 14 of the 24 chromosomes. Higher-resolution techniques revealed additional complexity in all cases. Despite the advances provided by OGM and lrGS, conventional karyotyping remained indispensable for complete rearrangement resolution. In two patients, the findings supported a novel mechanism combining features of the different chromoanagenesis processes. Furthermore, evidence of inherited alterations was identified, and the comprehensive characterization of the rearrangements enabled more accurate genotype–phenotype correlations. Our findings indicate that an integrated approach combining karyotyping, OGM, and lrGS can completely resolve SVs, including complex rearrangements.

Article activity feed