Assessing the association between contraceptive agency and preference-aligned fertility management among Ugandan women: A 12-month prospective cohort study
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
There has been a proliferation of new person-centered and human rights-based contraception measures in recent years, though their application in research remains limited. Improved measures offer an opportunity to examine how contraceptive decision-making agency relates to individuals’ ability to act in line with their contraceptive preferences. We sought to assess the association between contraceptive agency and subsequent Preference-aligned Fertility Management (PFM) over 12 months in a cohort of women in rural Uganda.
Methods
We analyzed data from a prospective cohort study conducted in five largely rural Ugandan districts from 2022 to 2024. Data were collected at baseline, 6 and 12 months from a convenience sample of women who were new users of contraception or not using contraception. We used mixed-effects logistic regression models to examine the association between baseline Agency in Contraceptive Decisions Scale overall and subscale scores and future PFM Index scores at 6 and 12 months, assessing whether associations varied over time using interaction terms for follow-up time point. We used interactions between agency scores and follow-up visit to assess whether associations differed between the 6- and 12-month visits. We assessed effect modification by age group and baseline contraceptive method category using three-way interaction terms and predicted probabilities.
Results
The analytic sample comprised 2,227 women. The percentage of women practicing PFM increased from 85.7% at baseline to 93.3% at 12 months. A one-unit increase in Agency in Contraceptive Decisions Scale score was associated with higher odds of subsequent PFM (aOR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.10– 2.54). Subscales 3 (knowledge aligned with preferences) and 4 (control over use or non-use) of the Agency in Contraceptive Decisions Scale were significantly associated with future PFM (aOR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.04–1.66 and aOR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.06–1.51, respectively). The association between overall contraceptive agency and PFM did not differ between the 6- and 12-month visits. Three-way interaction tests suggested that the associations between the overall Agency in Contraceptive Decisions Scale score and the PFM outcomes varied jointly by age group and baseline contraceptive method category: overall PFM Index (p<0.001), PFM1 (p=0.011), and PFM2 (p<0.001).
Conclusion
Our findings suggest that higher levels of contraceptive agency may help women act in line with their contraceptive preferences. Increasing women’s knowledge and control over contraceptive use may be particularly essential for preferred contraceptive use. The findings also suggest that the association between contraceptive agency and PFM may vary by women’s age group and the method of choice, though further exploration is necessary to examine this influence.
