Test-Retest Reliability of Motor Evoked Potentials Across Eight Bilateral Lower-Limb Muscles
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Objectives
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is widely used to probe corticospinal excitability by eliciting motor evoked potential (MEP)s in targeted muscles, with MEP characteristics such as magnitude and latency reflecting the physiological state of the pathways being stimulated. Although numerous studies have examined MEP reliability in upper extremity muscles, less is known about the reliability of this measurement across the lower extremity. We hypothesized that inter-session, test-retest reliability of MEPs recorded simultaneously from multiple lower-limb muscles, from a single TMS location, would differ by muscle, stimulation intensity, and quantification method.
Materials and Methods
Ten healthy participants (5 males, 5 females) completed three TMS sessions separated by one week. At each session, the stimulation hotspot was identified using a five-location virtual grid anchored at the vertex, with electromyography (EMG) recorded from all eight muscles of interest at each grid location; the grid location producing the largest and most consistent MEPs in the tibialis anterior (TA), the primary target muscle, was selected as the stimulation site and held constant across all three sessions. MEPs were then recorded bilaterally from the TA, soleus, rectus femoris, and biceps femoris muscles at two stimulation intensities (110% and 120% resting motor threshold (RMT)). MEP size was quantified using mean rectified magnitude and peak-to-peak amplitude, and inter-session reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Bland-Altman analysis was used to characterize the range of measurement variability across all eight muscles.
Results
MEP size differed across sessions, and reliability varied by muscle, intensity, and quantification method. The highest reliability was observed in the right TA, the muscle used to establish the stimulation hotspot, using mean rectified magnitude at 120% RMT. Reliability was comparatively lower in the seven non-target muscles recorded from the same fixed stimulation site, indicating that MEP consistency was not uniform across the lower-limb musculature.
Conclusions
MEP reliability in the lower extremity varies by muscle, stimulation intensity, and quantification method. MEPs were most reliable in the TA, the muscle used to establish the stimulation site, while reliability was lower in the other seven muscles.
