Ipsilateral rest tremor-dopamine transporter correlation reflects a broader dopaminergic difference, not tremor-specific pathophysiology
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background and Objectives
To test whether the positive correlation between rest tremor (RT) and ipsilateral striatal DAT binding reflects a tremor-specific ipsilateral mechanism or simply the globally better-preserved dopamine terminals in RT patients.
Methods
We compared ipsilateral and contralateral correlations between striatal binding, rest tremor, bradykinesia and rigidity in two cross-sectional Parkinson disease cohorts from the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (baseline, N=1055; follow-up, median 2.2 years, N=652). We tested whether correlations survived permutation testing that shuffled severity scores isolating severity-dependent effects from group-level effects and used out-of-sample prediction to compare how well binding predicted symptom presence versus severity.
Results
Bradykinesia and rigidity showed large contralateral correlations, distinguishable from the permutation null in every comparison, and predicted both presence and severity. Rest tremor’s ipsilateral correlation was not distinguishable from the null in most comparisons. Striatal binding, both ipsi or contralateral, predicted its presence (AUC 0.55–0.61) but not its severity (R 2 ≤0.002), in both cohorts.
Conclusions
Our findings argue against a direct pathophysiologic link between tremor amplitude and ipsilateral dopaminergic function. More parsimoniously, the ipsilateral binding–RT correlation likely reflects a distinct degeneration pattern in patients with RT rather than a graded, dose-dependent circuit mechanism.
