Evaluating cranial electrotherapy stimulation for anxiety associated with breathlessness in palliative care: a mixed-methods feasibility study

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objectives

To explore the acceptability and tolerability of cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) using Alpha-Stim AID as a potential intervention for anxiety associated with breathlessness in people with advanced chronic respiratory disease.

Methods

A multicentre, mixed-methods, non-randomised interventional feasibility study with a parallel usual-care control group. Participants were adults with chronic respiratory disease and significant anxiety and breathlessness symptoms (assessed via Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale) receiving care from hospice services. The intervention groups used Alpha-Stim AID for eight weeks either at a fixed or personalised dose, followed by a four-week follow-up period. This feasibility study was not powered to assess clinical efficacy.

Results

12.5% of screened patients at the primary site were eligible, and 29 unique participants were recruited. Three participants withdrew from the study (10.3%), none of which were attributable to CES. Most adverse events were mild, with headache reported frequently across control and intervention groups. Outcome measure completion was high, with data missingness below 6.4%. Numerical rating scales of anxiety and breathlessness fluctuated daily and remained broadly static, whereas GAD-7 scores assessing anxiety improved over time across all groups. This feasibility study was not powered to assess clinical efficacy.

Conclusion

CES using Alpha-Stim AID was deliverable within hospice services and was generally acceptable and tolerable among participants who enrolled. Our findings support further evaluation which should involve a fully-powered randomised controlled trial against a sham device to determine whether CES provides clinically meaningful improvements in anxiety for this patient population.

What is already known on this topic

  • Anxiety is common amongst patients with chronic respiratory diseases, such as COPD and interstitial lung disease. Management is primarily non-pharmacological.

  • Cranial electrotherapy stimulation is used for treatment of anxiety related to primary anxiety disorders, such as generalised anxiety disorder.

  • No studies have been carried out exploring cranial electrotherapy stimulation in a palliative care population.

What this study adds

  • Cranial electrotherapy stimulation using Alpha-Stim AID was deliverable within hospice services. The intervention was generally accepted and tolerable amongst enrolled participants.

  • Headache was common across all three groups. Dizziness was more commonly reported in the personalised dose group.

How this study might affect research, practice or policy

  • Our findings support the future development of a definitive randomised controlled trial against a sham device to determine whether CES has a clinically meaningful effect for anxiety in this patient group.

Article activity feed