Orthology transfer maps only the conserved core of the Varroa destructor proteome and over-calls host absence two times in three
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
The ectoparasitic mite Varroa destructor is the principal threat to managed honey bees, and a test case for the genome-scale methods applied to non-model organisms, nearly all of which infer from orthology. We reconstructed the first genome-wide protein-interaction network for V. destructor (7,080 proteins, 335,914 interactions), whose modular structure exceeds a degree-preserving null by 368 standard deviations, but whose every edge is interolog-transferred and every node conserved at least to Eukaryota. None of the 791 genes lacking an orthologous group enters it — arithmetic rather than discovery — yet the excluded compartment is large and coherent. It comprises 3,161 genes (30.9% of the proteome), shorter and less annotated than the rest; an annotation-free genome search detects orphans in a tick genome at 4.0% against 70.4% for networked genes. Within the orthology-bearing compartment visibility is non-monotonic: the Acari-level bin (74.1%) falls below the Arthropoda-level bin (89.9%). The same logic applied to host comparison yields a benchmarked error: of genes called absent from Apis on group identity alone, 67.4% recover a sequence homologue — against zero for a shuffled null and 1.3% in the presence direction — rising to 78.3% in the least panel-biased stratum. Both figures are properties of the calling rule: under an identity floor the error directions cross near 34% identity; orthology cannot be said to err in either direction without fixing the criterion first. Host divergence resolves into gene absence and residue-level substitution, falling in those two compartments respectively. A bee-sparing target map follows as broader impact.
Significance statement
Biologists routinely work out what an unstudied organism’s genes do, and which of them differ from those of its host, by matching those genes to counterparts in well-studied species: a shortcut that is fast, standard and almost never checked. Using the honey-bee parasite Varroa destructor , we show that this shortcut has two blind spots that pull in the same direction, because a network built this way contains only the mite’s ancient shared machinery and none of the fast-evolving secreted proteins that make it a parasite, while the same matching, used to decide that a gene is missing from the bee, is wrong about two times in three. Since both errors fall precisely on the genes that distinguish a parasite from its host, comparative work on any non-model organism needs a second, sequence-level check before an absence can be believed.
Submitted as a separate file, 4:3 landscape, 160 × 120 mm, TIF at 600 dpi. Not a numbered display item.