Evaluation of Sex Hormones in Autoimmune Diseases in Pre- and Post-Menopausal Women
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Autoimmune diseases have shown biased proportion in female population, existing clinical investigations of sex hormones in autoimmune populations have been relatively limited in terms of patient size and types of hormones investigated. In this study, we examined the relationship of sexual hormones and autoimmune antibodies in a large cohort of US women. This retrospective study sample included a total of 15319 female subjects’ medical information that were collected between December 2015 to May 2019 and tested in the Vibrant America Clinical Laboratory. The present serum sample was limited to female participants who had ever menstruated at the time of blood collection and completed the testing of the autoimmune antibodies and sex hormones. We focused on a total of 13 clinically significant autoantibodies including antinuclear antibody (ANA), 11 anti-extractable nuclear antigens (anti-ENAs), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide 3 (anti-CCP3), and 11 female sex hormones. First, the prevalence of serological autoantibodies in a large set of adult female subjects divided by the menopause age was investigated. Next, the levels of sex hormones were compared in the seropositive autoimmune subjects and seronegative controls across the pre- and post-menopausal female groups. The presented study involving a large cohort of females showed no statistically different levels of sex hormones in seropositive autoimmune subjects and matched controls except for DHEA-s.
Strengths and limitations of this study
-
For the first time, a large cohort of female subjects (N=15319) and their levels of 13 autoantibodies and 11 sex hormones were evaluated.
-
When possible, we concluded major literatures in related topics and compared with the data reported in this study.
-
Data were derived from a single laboratory, and the study was retrospective, which could have caused bias.