Readability Assessment of Patient-Reported Measures Used During Heritable Cancer Genetic Testing
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
Patient-reported measures (PRMs), including patient-reported outcome and experience measures, capture patients’ perspectives on their health status and healthcare experiences. In cancer genetics, PRMs have been used to assess genetic knowledge, psychosocial outcomes, and decision-making. However, patients must understand these measures to provide useful information, an ability which is influenced by general and health literacy levels. Readability guidelines recommend that patient-facing materials be written at or below a Grade 6 level. This study evaluated the readability of PRMs used in a cancer genetic testing context.
Objective
To assess whether PRMs used in heritable cancer genetic testing meet recommended readability levels using validated indices.
Methods
PRMs were identified from a recent systematic review of PRMs used in heritable cancer genetic testing, which reported 83 instruments across eight categories. English-language PRMs containing structured question items and response scales were eligible for extraction and converted into plain text for analysis. Readability was assessed using four validated indices: Flesch Kincaid Grading Level (FKGL), FORd, CAylor, and STicht (FORCAST) formula, Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) via an automated readability software. Descriptive analysis and numerical comparison evaluated readability levels across PRM categories and against the recommended Grade 6 reading level.
Results
Sixty-five PRMs met the eligibility criteria, with most, including validated instruments, exceeding the recommended Grade 6 reading level. Across the eight categories, genetics-specific PRMs required the highest readability levels, indicating higher readability demands.
Conclusions
Most PRMs, particularly those specific to genetics, do not meet readability guidelines. This may limit their accessibility to individuals with limited general and health literacy. Development of PRMs specific to genetics should consider strategies to improve readability, such as plain-language approaches and involvement of individuals with limited general or health literacy.
