More Than Just Arm Movement: Finger-Worn Accelerometers Provide a Valid and Sensitive Alternative to Wrist-Worn Accelerometers for Measuring Real-World Upper-Limb Performance in Stroke Survivors
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Objective
To investigate the clinical validity of finger-worn accelerometers for providing a comprehensive assessment of upper-limb motor performance in stroke survivors in real-world environments, compared to wrist-worn accelerometers, and to examine how the clinimetric properties of wearable-based motor performance measures vary with the duration of patient data collection.
Design
Cross-sectional observational design.
Setting
Research laboratory and free-living environments.
Participants
Twenty-seven stroke survivors aged 18-80 years with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke at least six months prior to enrollment and mild-to-moderate upper-limb impairment without severe range-of-motion restrictions were enrolled. Three participants were ineligible and four withdrew, resulting in a final cohort of 20 participants (N = 20).
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures
Wearable-based motor performance measures derived from fine-hand movements, gross-arm movements, and the combination of fine-hand and gross-arm movements captured by finger-worn and wrist-worn accelerometers in naturalistic settings for 6.4 ± 1.8 days.
Results
Wearable-based motor performance measures from fine-hand movements demonstrated the strongest convergent validity, known-group validity, and test-retest reliability, followed by those from combined and gross-arm movements. Convergent validity and test-retest reliability of wearable-based motor performance measures improved with longer monitoring durations, with four days being sufficient to obtain accurate and reliable upper-limb measures.
Conclusions
Wearable-based motor performance measures from finger-worn accelerometers provide a more comprehensive assessment of upper-limb motor performance than those from wrist-worn accelerometers, supporting their use for real-world monitoring in stroke survivors. Furthermore, the improvements in clinimetric properties of wearable-based motor performance measures with longer monitoring durations highlight the importance of multi-day monitoring to mitigate day-to-day variability and ensure robust assessment.
