Feasibility of adjusting for sepsis-related organ dysfunction in pediatric patients using administrative healthcare data
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
Risk adjustment for disease severity in pediatric intensive care research commonly relies on clinical organ dysfunction scores requiring detailed clinical and laboratory information, which is often unavailable in administrative healthcare datasets. We therefore evaluated the feasibility of a coding-based Pediatric Organ Dysfunction Index (PODI) derived from International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) and Operation and Procedure System (OPS) codes, for approximating sepsis-related organ dysfunction and adjusting for disease severity, using the pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) score as a reference standard.
Methods
In this retrospective single-center cohort study, pediatric sepsis episodes treated between November 2011 and November 2021 were identified. Discrimination for in-hospital mortality and calibration were assessed. Agreement between PODI and pSOFA was quantified using Spearman’s rank correlation, and organ-specific agreement using sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. An expanded PODI incorporating additional ICD-10 and OPS codes was evaluated in sensitivity analyses.
Results
A total of 488 pediatric sepsis episodes were included, with an in-hospital mortality of 14.1%. The PODI showed good discrimination for in-hospital mortality (AUC 0.85, 95% CI 0.80-0.89), comparable to the maximum pSOFA (pSOFA max ) (AUC 0.78, 95% CI 0.72-0.83) and superior to pSOFA at sepsis onset (pSOFA onset ) (AUC 0.73, 95% CI 0.67-0.80). Agreement between PODI and pSOFA organ-specific components varied considerably across organ systems, with the highest sensitivity to detect pulmonary dysfunction. Correlation between both scores was moderate (0.54 for pSOFA onset and 0.60 for pSOFA max ), indicating that comparable predictive performance does not render the scores interchangeable. The expanded PODI improved organ-level sensitivity for selected components but did not meaningfully improve mortality discrimination.
Conclusions
The standard PODI may represent a practical approach to adjust for organ dysfunction and therapy intensity in administrative datasets with ICD-10 coding where clinical and laboratory information is unavailable. Given only moderate agreement with the pSOFA, the PODI should be understood as a covariate for risk adjustment at the group level rather than as a substitute for clinical organ dysfunction scores in individual patients. Further validation and refinement in non-sepsis cohorts are required before broader implementation in large-scale administrative research can be recommended.
