A Deep Learning-Derived Insulin Resistance Index for Cardiovascular Risk Prediction: A Prospective Cohort Study with External Validation in Chinese and US Populations
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
Existing insulin resistance (IR) indices are predominantly developed in diabetic cohorts, limiting their generalizability. We developed a novel deep neural network–derived IR index (DNN-IR) using a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) framework and evaluated its predictive performance for incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality in general populations.
Methods
We utilized data from three cohorts: the cross-sectional REACTION study (Fujian subcohort, 2011-2012) for DNN-IR derivation and internal validation; and two prospective cohorts, NHANES (1999-2018, linked to the National Death Index) and CHARLS (2011-2018), for external validation. The DNN-IR was developed using a deep learning model based on a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture, trained on the REACTION dataset. We evaluated the DNN-IR’s utility in predicting incident CVD, cardiovascular mortality, and non-cardiovascular mortality among 13,889 NHANES and 7,047 CHARLS participants. Predictive performance was assessed via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Multivariable logistic regression, restricted cubic splines, and Kaplan-Meier analyses characterized the associations between DNN-IR and clinical outcomes.
Results
In the REACTION cohort, DNN-IR demonstrated superior predictive performance for atherosclerotic outcomes, achieving AUROCs of 0.89 (training) and 0.84 (internal validation). In the external CHARLS cohort (median follow-up: 7 years; 1,135 incident CVD cases [16.1%]), DNN-IR yielded AUROCs of 0.72 for incident CVD and 0.77 for all-cause mortality. Fully adjusted models showed that each 1-SD increment in DNN-IR was associated with a 23% higher CVD risk (OR=1.23, 95% CI: 1.14-1.32), exhibiting a predominantly linear dose-response relationship ( P -nonlinearity=0.453). In NHANES, DNN-IR robustly predicted cardiovascular (AUROC=0.77) and all-cause mortality (AUROC=0.72), alongside specific mortalities like diabetes (0.91), Alzheimer’s disease (0.88), and kidney disease (0.96). Higher DNN-IR levels correlated with stepwise increases in cumulative mortality (log-rank P <0.001).
Conclusions
The MoE-derived DNN-IR index demonstrated robust and stable performance in predicting atherosclerosis, incident CVD, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality in the general population. Further validation in larger, more diverse cohorts is warranted to support its broad clinical applicability.
