A blood-based signature of cytoskeletal and extracellular remodeling for risk stratification of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are recognized as precursor lesions to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the molecular programs underlying progression from low-grade dysplasia to advanced disease remain incompletely characterized. Herein, we performed an integrated plasma and tissue–proteomic analyses coupled with spatial and single-cell transcriptomics to identify biologically coherent remodeling programs reflected in circulation that distinguish IPMN by dysplasia grade and invasive disease.

Methods

Using the O-link proximity extension assay platform, a panel of 1,104 proteins were quantified in plasma samples collected from patients with low-grade (LG) IPMN (n=30), high-grade (HG) IPMN with or without associated PDAC (IPMN/PDAC; n=40) and PDAC without IPMN (n=8). Predictive performance of individual biomarkers were assessed; likelihood ratio testing was performed to identify protein biomarkers that were complementarity with CA19-9 for risk of malignancy of IPMN. Findings were intersected with available spatial (N= 13) and single-cell (N= 6) transcriptomic datasets of IPMN tissues as well as mass spectrometry-based proteomic profiles of an independent set of resected human IPMN tissues (N= 9).

Results

A total of 28, 43, and 35 circulating proteins were found to be differential in HG, IPMN/PDAC, and HG + IPMN/PDAC cases compared to LG IPMN. Among differential proteins were known PDAC-associated markers CEACAM5, CTRC, and REG3A as well as several biomarkers reflecting cytoskeletal and extracellular matrix remodeling and inflammatory processes. Focusing on cytoskeletal and ECM-related proteins and using likelihood ratio testing, an “OR” rule considering CA19-9, BGN, and ITGB1BP1 achieved overall sensitivity of 48.7% for HG + IPMN/PDAC, including 38.1% sensitivity for HG IPMN, at an overall specificity of 90%, which was improved compared to that of CA19-9 alone (overall sensitivity of 28.2%; McNemar Exact test 1-sided p-value: 0.011). Integrated proteomic and spatial transcriptomic datasets of IPMN tissues revealed coordinated alterations cytoskeletal and ECM remodeling and elevated matrix stiffness as prominent features associated with IPMN/PDAC, which paralleled concordant increases in BGN and ITGB1BP1. Cell-type of origin analyses based on spatial and single-cell data further revealed fibroblasts and myeloid cells as primary contributors to expression levels of BGN whereas ITGB1BP1 was primarily expressed in neoplastic epithelium.

Conclusion

Advanced IPMN dysplasia and invasive disease are characterized by coordinated tissue remodeling programs that are systemically reflected in circulating proteomic profiles. Blood-based biomarkers identified through our study, such as BGN and ITB1BP1, have potential to improve upon CA19-9 for risk stratification of IPMN to better guide clinical management.

Article activity feed