Immediate and carryover reproductive costs of infection in female but not male house finches
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Wildlife diseases cause well-documented and often dramatic reductions in host survival. However, the impact of infectious diseases on host reproduction remains understudied, especially with respect to effects of prior and/or current pathogen exposure on reproductive development. Here we experimentally tested how prior and/or current infection with a common bacterial pathogen, Mycoplasma gallisepticum (‘MG’), alters reproductive development for female versus male house finches ( Haemorhous mexicanus ). Finches were inoculated with either MG or sterile media while in wintering condition and subsequently received one of these treatments while in breeding condition. In females, MG exposure had both immediate and carry-over effects on reproduction: controls had higher odds of laying eggs compared to females inoculated with MG in spring only, higher odds than females inoculated in both winter and spring, and higher odds than females given MG in the winter only. Conversely, breeding-condition males inoculated with MG in spring had higher testosterone levels than males receiving only control inoculations, and there were no carryover effects of winter MG inoculation or inoculations during both seasons on testosterone. Sex bias in the reproductive impacts of infectious diseases may have important knock-on effects on the epidemiology and population-regulating effects of pathogens, thereby warranting further study.