Comparative Analysis of Muscle Fascia Tracking Algorithms for Real-Time Muscle Monitoring using Wearable Ultrasound

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSK-US) enables real-time imaging of muscle structure and function, and wearable ultrasound (WUS) has extended this capability to dynamic movement tasks. Accurate tracking of muscle fascia displacement in M-mode WUS images is essential for quantifying muscle function, yet the relative performance of existing fascia-tracking algorithms remains uncharacterized. This study directly compares five fascia-tracking algorithms: Maximum Pixel Intensity (MPI), Muscle Boundary Tracking Algorithm (MBTA), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Composite-Factorization PCA (CF-PCA), and U-Net segmentation, against expert-annotated ground truth to identify which approach best supports wearable muscle-monitoring applications. A total of 572 M-mode ultrasound images were collected during isometric quadricep activations (QA) and squats (SQ) using a multi-site WUS system with transducers positioned on the vastus lateralis (VL), rectus femoris (RF), and vastus medialis oblique (VMO). Fascia tracking using U-Net segmentation exhibited the lowest mean absolute error (median QA=0.57, median SQ=1.22; p<0.05), functional range not statistically different from expert traces (QA p=0.33; SQ p=1) and the most accurate estimates of functional error (median QA=-0.21; median SQ=-0.65; p<0.05). PCA-based methods demonstrated the highest correlation with the expert traces (PCA median QA=0.88; CF-PCA median QA=0.88; PCA median SQ=0.78; CF-PCA median SQ=0.75; p<0.005), reflecting superior tracking of relative contraction patterns. These results indicate U-Net segmentation is best suited for applications requiring precise fascia-depth estimation when labeled training data are available, while PCA-based methods are preferable for tracking relative contraction patterns without supervised training, informing algorithm selection for wearable neuromuscular monitoring in clinical and performance settings.

Article activity feed