Association of a Serum Proteomic Signature With Survival and Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients With NSCLC Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Serum proteomic signatures may reflect tumor- and host-related biology and serve as prognostic biomarkers in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We evaluated the association of the VeriStrat serum proteomic classification with survival outcomes and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with ICIs. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with NSCLC who received ICI-containing therapy and underwent VeriStrat testing at Northwestern Memorial Hospital from October 2015 through June 2023. Patients were classified as proteomic signature Good (PS-Good) or Poor (PS-Poor). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed among patients receiving palliative-intent ICI therapy. First any-grade and grade 3 or higher irAEs were evaluated in all ICI-treated patients using cumulative incidence functions and Fine-Gray competing-risk regression. Results: Among 162 ICI-treated patients included in the toxicity analysis, 129 received palliative-intent therapy and were included in the survival analysis; 91 (71%) were PS-Good and 38 (29%) were PS-Poor. PS-Good status was associated with longer PFS (median, 6 vs 3 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.33-0.77; P<0.01) and OS (median, 20 vs 8 months; HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39-0.91; P=0.02). These associations remained significant after multivariable adjustment for PFS (adjusted HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.26-0.82; P<0.01) and OS (adjusted HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28-0.87; P=0.01). Any-grade irAEs showed a nonsignificant trend toward a higher cumulative incidence in PS-Good patients. At 12 months, the cumulative incidence was 32.6% for PS-Good versus 22.5% for PS-Poor (subdistribution HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 0.77-3.02; P=0.23). The cumulative incidence of grade 3 or higher irAEs was similar between groups (16.3% vs 15.0%; subdistribution HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.48-2.62; P=0.79). Conclusions: PS-Good classification was independently associated with improved survival in patients with NSCLC receiving ICI-containing therapy. Although any-grade irAEs were numerically more frequent among PS-Good patients, proteomic classification was not significantly associated with any-grade or high-grade irAE risk. Prospective validation is warranted.

Article activity feed