The long-term epidemiological impacts of doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis and vaccination against multidrug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae : a mathematical modelling study

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxy-PEP) represents major advancements in sexually transmitted infection prevention for men who have sex with men (MSM), yet the joint long-term population-level impact on Neisseria gonorrhoeae transmission dynamics and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) together with a moderately effective vaccine remains uncertain. Here, we developed a deterministic transmission model calibrated to empirical surveillance data from England to evaluate the 15-year epidemiological interactions of implementing doxy-PEP and vaccination at the population level. The model incorporates the tetracycline- and ceftriaxone- susceptible, tetracycline-resistant (Tet-R), ceftriaxone-resistant (Cef-R), and dual-resistant (Dual-R) strains. Our simulations suggest that the unmitigated deployment of doxy-PEP provides only modest reductions in overall gonorrhoea burden, yielding a net programmatic efficiency of 0.072 (95% CrI: 0.018 – 0.23) averted infections per enrolment over the 15-year horizon. Although doxy-PEP reduces tetracycline- and ceftriaxone-susceptible infections, it consistently selects for Tet-R lineages. Conversely, standalone vaccination yields substantially greater epidemiological benefit, averting 0.73 (95% CrI: 0.17 – 1.63) overall infections per enrolment. When deployed in tandem, the dual intervention strategy achieves the greatest overall effectiveness to 0.83 (95% CrI: 0.22 – 1.71) averted infections per enrolment while mitigating the Tet-R selection pressure observed under standalone doxy-PEP. Long-term strain dynamics were found to be governed by background frontline ceftriaxone treatment failure rates rather than intervention uptake. Under a scenario of compromised ceftriaxone efficacy (20% treatment failure), doxy-PEP is projected to favour expansion of Dual-R strain, yielding 510 (95% CrI: 38 –258600) excess Dual-R infections across the 15-year horizon (146.18% [95% CrI: 31.30 – 920.86%] cumulative increase) and triggering sustained transmission exceeding the no-intervention baseline. Conversely, vaccination standalone or combined strategies consistently suppress overall transmission. By year 15, annual Cef-R and Dual-R infections are restricted to ≤ 19 infections under both vaccine-inclusive approaches. These findings suggest that the public health utility of antibiotic prophylaxis is heavily contingent upon the preserved efficacy of frontline therapeutics. Our work demonstrates that single-agent prophylaxis risks localized containment of some pathogens at the cost of driving multidrug-resistant selection in others and underscores the necessity of integrating non-selective tools like vaccines to manage N. gonorrhoeae .

One Sentence Summary

Combining vaccination with doxycycline prophylaxis improves gonorrhoea control while limiting antimicrobial resistance.

Article activity feed