High quality analysis of circulating biomarkers reveals no evidence of elevated inflammatory markers in a long COVID cohort recruited at a primary care center

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Long COVID (LC) is a broad label encompassing the heterogeneous long-term consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection that persist for at least 2–3 months post-infection. Despite its substantial global burden, there is still a lack of reliable biomarkers or panels capable of distinguishing individuals with Long COVID from healthy individuals or from those who have recovered from acute COVID-19. We previously characterized a biomarker panel comparing 85 adults with WHO-defined Long COVID against 85 age- and sex-matched controls who had recovered within three months of acute COVID-19 in 2020, at 12–24 months post-infection. That initial profile evaluated blood cell counts, coagulation status, routine SARS-CoV-2 serology, immune cell populations, and basic cytokine levels based on Luminex assays. We have enhanced our biomarker panel by incorporating more precise cytokine quantification using the high-precision ELLA automated immunoassay system. To assess potential ongoing peripheral systemic inflammation, we measured classical inflammatory markers in blood, including C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-6. In this manuscript, we present data that confirm age- and gender-matching between the LC and control group; and compared differences in cytokine levels and comorbidities.

Article activity feed