Assessing MRI Biomarker Repeatability to Guide Individualized TMS Treatment in Psychiatry
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
MRI has increasingly been explored as a biomarker for detecting structural and functional brain changes. For clinical decision-making, it is crucial to validate observed changes in MRI indices at the individual level. The uncertainty in longitudinal MRI indices can be quantified using the repeatability coefficient (RC).
Methods
Twenty healthy controls (10 males, 10 females) underwent two test-retest sessions of structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) on the same day, separated by a 30-minute interval. RC values and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for subcortical volumes, cortical thickness, and within-network functional connectivity. Additionally, 33 patients with mental health disorders underwent MRI before and after 20 sessions of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Percentage changes in MRI-derived indices were assessed at the individual level, with changes exceeding the RC threshold considered indicative of true change beyond measurement uncertainty.
Results
The RC showed measurement variability in subcortical volumetric in the range of 8% to 17.5% for caudate and left amygdala, respectively. For cortical thickness, the RC was measured between 3.5% and 16.5% for the left occipital pole and the left temporal pole, respectively. The RC% for fractional anisotropy (FA) measures were variable between 11.3% (the left middle cingulum) and 62.9% (the right anterior cingulum). For within-network connectivity, the RC was measured in a range of 9.7% and 29.4% for sensorimotor and visual networks, respectively. TMS-treated patients exhibited no changes beyond the RC in almost all subcortical volumes and within-network connectivity. The most frequent changes beyond the uncertainty were observed in FA measures, particularly in the posterior cingulum, where 17 out of 23 patients exhibited clinically meaningful alterations.
Conclusion
Structural brain features extracted from MRI demonstrated high reliability. Among all measures, FA, reflecting white matter integrity, was most sensitive in detecting neural changes following TMS, highlighting its potential utility as a treatment-responsive biomarker.
