Modern Convolutional Design Improves Uterine MRI Segmentation, while nnU-Net Remains Most Robust Across Heterogeneous Datasets
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate how segmentation architecture and dataset-adaptive configuration influence uterine MRI segmentation across heterogeneous benign and malignant tasks.
Methods
U-Net, Swin-UNETR, and MedNeXt were compared with nnU-Net as a self-configuring reference across T2-weighted MRI datasets: public multiclass UMD anatomy/fibroid segmentation (n=300), institutional endometrial cancer tumor segmentation (n=206), and institutional uterine mass lesion segmentation (n=234). A relabeled external UMD-style cohort (n=12) assessed domain shift. Models used fixed partitions, fold ensembling, Dice, HD95, ASSD, volume error, and paired bootstrap comparisons with Holm correction.
Results
MedNeXt was the strongest manually controlled architecture. nnU-Net achieved the highest performance on all internal datasets and external testing. Macro-Dice reached 0.761, 0.746, and 0.814 for nnU-Net on UMD, endometrial cancer, and uterine mass datasets, respectively, versus 0.722, 0.726, and 0.789 for MedNeXt. The nnU-Net-MedNeXt gap was largest for multiclass UMD segmentation and smaller in binary tasks. External testing degraded all models; nnU-Net remained highest (0.542), followed by MedNeXt (0.490), U-Net (0.396), and Swin-UNETR (0.287).
Conclusions
Uterine MRI segmentation performance depended on task, architecture, and evaluation domain. MedNeXt supported modern convolutional design as a strong manual baseline, but nnU-Net remained the most robust overall, emphasizing the importance of dataset-adaptive configuration and external validation.
