A Reproducible MFASS Benchmark of Splice-Disruption Predictors Reveals a Shared Exon-Interior Blind Spot

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

We benchmark four published splicing variant-effect predictors against a multiplexed experimental splicing assay. On 27,733 single-nucleotide variants in and around human exons from MFASS with measured exon-inclusion outcomes, Pangolin is the strongest predictor of splice-disrupting variants (AUROC 0.888, average precision 0.421), ahead of SpliceAI (0.819, 0.321) and SpliceTransformer (0.786, 0.317), with MMSplice fourth (0.758, 0.256); all four exceed the older SPANR model (0.748, 0.228). The ranking reproduces the relative performance reported by the Pangolin authors, a correctness check on the pipeline. A calibrated consensus of the three deep-learning sequence-window predictors, evaluated on an exon-grouped held-out split, does not meaningfully improve over Pangolin alone. Stratifying by distance to the splice site exposes a shared blind spot: all five tools detect disruptions within a few bases of the splice site well, but recall declines sharply in the exon interior, and 19% of disrupting variants are missed by every tool; these shared misses are enriched among variants away from splice sites, and are predominantly exon-interior. MMSplice, the one model built for modular exonic and intronic effects rather than splice-site recognition, shows the same distance-dependent decline, so the blind spot is not an artifact of splice-site-centric architectures. Every number is computed against fixed experimental ground truth and is reproducible from the public dataset and the released code.

Article activity feed